MA 2022 State Legislative Results

No major surprises when comparing race results to model fundamentals

Brent Benson
2022-11-14

There were no major surprises in the contested Massachusetts state legislative elections on November 8, 2022. The State Representative race that looked like it would be the most competitive based on our fundamentals-based model (1st Middlesex) did turn out incredibly close and has not yet been called. Another race that looked reasonably safe (2nd Essex) ended up closer than expected and has not been called by the AP. A State Senate race that looked close from a fundamentals point of view (Hampden, Hampton and Worcester) came down safely in Democratic territory, as did a race where pundits felt GOP strength might win out (Norfolk, Worcester and Middlesex).

1st Middlesex

The model expected a nail-biter in the 1st Middlesex State Representative race between Margaret Scarsdale (D-Pepperell), Andrew Shepherd (R-Townsend), and independent candidate Catherine Lundeen (I-Pepperell) and nail-biter is what we got. As of this writing, Shepherd looks to be ahead by 34 votes out of 19,633 votes cast, a margin of 0.17 percentage points. The race seems to be headed for a recount.

2nd Essex

The biggest surprise of the night was the tight margin in the 2nd Essex State Representative race between incumbent Rep. Leonard Mirra (R-Georgetown) and challenger Kristin Kassner (D-Hamilton). The model expected a high-single digit two-party margin in favor of Mirra, but the current count shows a tiny 84 vote lead out of 23,114 votes case, a margin of 0.36 percentage points. This race has also not been officially called by the Associated Press. The results are still inside the 90% error bars of the model, but it is an outlier.

Hampden, Hampton and Worcester

On the State Senate side our model rated the Hampden, Hampton and Worcester District—the post-redistricting version of the district represented by Lt. Governor candidate Eric Lesser (D-Longmeadow)—as the most competitive race. A reader who understood the specifics of this race gave the opinion that State Rep. Oliveira (D-Ludlow) held a strong advantage over business person William Johsnon (R-Granby) based on the structure of the district and the influence of Oliveira’s State Representative district. Tuesday’s result seemed to bear that out with Oliveira getting 56% of the two-party vote, not close, but still well within the 90% confidence interval of the model.

Norfolk, Worcester and Middlesex

I took a fairly close look at the Norfolk, Worcester and Middlesex state senate race between incumbent Senator Becca Rausch (D-Needham) and sitting State Rep. Shawn Dooley (R-Norfolk). There seemed to be some conventional wisdom that the race would be close because of the red-to-purple reputation of the district in its previous incarnation as the Norfolk, Worcester and Bristol with former GOP State Senators Richard Ross (R-Wrentham) and Scott Brown (R-Wrentham).

However, the district is full of towns that have swung in the Democratic direction since the Trump era. This swing pushed the model to have high expectations of a Rausch win. Rausch’s victory with 55% of the two-party vote was fairly comfortable, and could have been higher if not for the strong name recognition of Rep. Dooley in the area and the large amount of money spent on boths sides. It is hard to see this district as purple anymore with its D+12 Partisan Voter Index.

Contested State Rep results
district PVI Incumbent Winner Margin Model D R other
Low margin High
7th Plymouth R+1 GOP GOP −26 −24 −13 −2 Sullivan (R-Abington) Griffin (W-Whitman)
7th Worcester R+1 GOP GOP −25 −23 −12 −1 Frost (R-Auburn) Dotson (U-Millbury)
1st Bristol D+6 GOP GOP −17 −18 −7 4 Roche (D-Mansfield) Barrows (R-Mansfield)
8th Plymouth R+1 GOP GOP −10 −24 −13 −2 Haikola (D-Raynham) D'Emilia (R-Bridgewater)
3rd Hampden R+7 GOP GOP −10 −28 −17 −6 Russo (D-Agawam) Boldyga (R-Southwick)
11th Worcester D+12 GOP GOP −9 −14 −2 9 Fishman (D-Shrewsbury) Kane (R-Shrewsbury)
1st Plymouth D+3 GOP GOP −8 −20 −9 2 Palmer (D-Plymouth) Muratore (R-Plymouth)
3rd Barnstable D+6 GOP GOP −6 −17 −7 5 Alfano (D-Bourne) Vieira (R-Falmouth)
22nd Middlesex D+1 GOP GOP −5 −22 −11 0 English (D-Billerica) Lombardo (R-Billerica)
5th Plymouth EVEN GOP GOP −2 −23 −12 0 Dockter (D-Hanover) Decoste (R-Norwell)
9th Norfolk D+6 GOP −1 −7 4 15 Kalkut (D-Norfolk) Vaughn (R-Wrentham)
2nd Essex D+9 GOP Unk1 0 −16 −5 6 Kassner (D-Hamilton) Mirra (R-Georgetown)
1st Middlesex D+2 Unk1 0 −11 1 12 Scarsdale (D-Pepperell) Shepherd (R-Townsend) Lundeen (I-Pepperell)
4th Worcester D+5 Dem Dem 2 −1 10 21 Higgins (D-Leominster) Dombrowski (U-Leominster)
7th Hampden D+6 Dem 3 −7 4 15 Saunders (D-Belchertown) Harrington (R-Ludlow)
8th Bristol R+2 Dem Dem 3 −6 4 16 Schmid (D-Westport) Gendreau (R-Westport)
2nd Worcester R+1 Dem Dem 3 −6 5 17 Zlotnik (D-Gardner) Chester (R-Gardner)
1st Barnstable D+9 Dem 4 −5 6 17 Flanagan (D-Dennis) Post (R-Yarmouth) Kasparian (WTP-Yarmouth)
14th Essex D+8 Dem 2 4 −6 5 17 Ramos (D-North Andover) Finn (R-North Andover)
5th Bristol R+1 Dem Dem 4 −6 5 16 Haddad (D-Somerset) Thurber (R-Somerset)
12th Plymouth D+1 Dem Dem 4 −4 6 17 Lanatra (D-Kingston) Meschino (R-Plymouth) Mccoy (NP-Kingston)
19th Middlesex EVEN Dem Dem 6 −6 6 17 Robertson (D-Wilmington) Sarnowski (R-Wilmington)
6th Plymouth D+3 Dem Dem 6 −3 8 19 Cutler (D-Duxbury) Sweezey (R-Hanson)
10th Bristol D+2 Dem Dem 6 −3 7 18 Straus (D-Mattapoisett) Swift (R-Mattapoisett)
3rd Bristol D+5 Dem Dem 7 −2 10 21 Doherty (D-Taunton) Coute (R-Taunton)
17th Worcester D+15 Dem Dem 9 5 17 28 Leboeuf (D-Worcester) Fullen (R-Worcester)
1st Essex D+12 Dem 9 −3 9 20 Shand (D-Newburyport) Fitzwater (R-Salisbury)
18th Essex D+10 Dem Dem 10 2 13 24 Nguyen (D-Andover) Dufour (R-Tewksbury)
2nd Bristol D+6 Dem Dem 10 −1 10 21 Hawkins (D-Attleboro) Escobar (R-Attleboro)
12th Worcester D+6 Dem Dem 10 −1 10 21 Kilcoyne (D-Clinton) Vulcano (R-Northborough)
9th Plymouth D+8 Dem Dem 10 0 11 23 Cassidy (D-Brockton) Novak (R-Brockton)
36th Middlesex R+3 Dem Dem 11 −8 3 14 Garry (D-Dracut) Boag (R-Dracut)
2nd Barnstable D+6 Dem Dem 12 −1 10 21 Diggs (D-Barnstable) Peters (R-Barnstable)
3rd Worcester D+9 Dem Dem 13 1 13 23 Kushmerek (D-Fitchburg) Packard (R-Fitchburg)
10th Norfolk D+9 Dem Dem 14 1 13 24 Roy (D-Franklin) Bailey (R-Franklin)
4th Norfolk D+7 Dem Dem 14 0 11 23 Murphy (D-Weymouth) Rotondo (R-Weymouth)
8th Hampden D+4 Dem 15 −9 2 14 Arriaga (D-Chicopee) Goonan (I-Chicopee)
2nd Middlesex D+14 Dem Dem 15 5 16 27 Arciero (D-Westford) Xie (R-Westford)
8th Middlesex D+17 Dem 15 1 12 24 Arena-Derosa (D-Holliston) Barnes (R-Millis)
16th Middlesex D+11 Dem 15 −4 7 18 Elliott (D-Lowell) Miller (R-Lowell)
2nd Franklin D+6 Dem Ind 17 −1 10 21 Whipps (I-Athol) Raymond (R-Athol) Mckeown (U-Gill)
19th Worcester D+18 Dem 17 2 13 24 Donaghue (D-Westborough) Hostage (R-Southborough)
8th Norfolk D+17 Dem Dem 2 19 7 18 30 Philips (D-Sharon) Terban (R-Stoughton)
5th Essex D+16 Dem Dem 2 19 7 18 29 Ferrante (D-Gloucester) Sullivan (R-Gloucester)
2nd Norfolk D+15 Dem Dem 20 6 17 29 Chan (D-Quincy) Cintolo (R-Quincy)
28th Middlesex D+20 Dem Dem 21 10 21 32 Mcgonagle (D-Everett) Marchese (U-Everett)
31st Middlesex D+13 Dem Dem 21 5 16 27 Day (D-Stoneham) Menounos (I-Winchester)
11th Suffolk D+28 Dem 23 9 20 31 Garcia (D-Chelsea) Taylor (R-Chelsea)
14th Middlesex D+22 Dem 23 5 16 27 Cataldo (D-Concord) Cleaves (R-Chelmsford)
5th Suffolk D+42 Dem 39 20 31 42 Worrell (D-Boston) Owens (I-Boston)
3rd Berkshire D+23 Dem Dem 2 40 12 23 34 Pignatelli (D-Lenox) Lavery (GR-Becket)
14th Norfolk D+25 Dem Dem 42 13 25 36 Peisch (D-Wellesley) Rolde (GR-Weston)
1 Winner has not been called by AP
2 Not all results reported
Contested State Senate results
district PVI Incumbent Winner Margin Model D R other
Low margin High
First Essex and Middlesex D+10 GOP GOP 1 −22 −15 −4 7 Tarr (R-Gloucester) Cudney (I-Gloucester)
First Plymouth and Norfolk D+9 GOP GOP −11 −16 −5 6 Stephens (D-Hanson) O'Connor (R-Weymouth)
Third Bristol and Plymouth R+1 Dem Dem 4 −6 5 16 Pacheco (D-Taunton) Collins (R-Taunton)
Worcester and Hampshire EVEN Dem Dem 4 −5 6 16 Gobi (D-Spencer) Amorello (R-Holden)
Norfolk, Worcester and Middlesex D+12 Dem Dem 5 4 15 25 Rausch (D-Needham) Dooley (R-Wrentham)
Plymouth and Barnstable D+4 Dem Dem 6 −3 9 20 Moran (D-Falmouth) Macrae (R-Bourne)
Hampden, Hampshire and Worcester D+4 Dem 6 −9 2 13 Oliveira (D-Ludlow) Johnson (R-Granby)
Second Essex and Middlesex D+6 Dem Dem 7 −1 10 21 Finegold (D-Andover) Defranco (R-Haverhill)
First Bristol and Plymouth D+1 Dem Dem 7 −4 6 18 Rodrigues (D-Westport) Protentis (R-Lakeville)
Worcester and Middlesex D+8 Dem Dem 10 0 11 23 Cronin (D-Lunenburg) Hoyt (R-Westford)
Bristol and Norfolk D+8 Dem Dem 10 1 12 23 Feeney (D-Foxborough) Chaisson (R-Foxborough) Saylor (W-Mansfield)
Norfolk and Plymouth D+9 Dem Dem 13 1 13 24 Keenan (D-Quincy) Innes (R-Hanover)
Fifth Middlesex D+16 Dem Dem 13 6 18 29 Lewis (D-Winchester) Dombroski (R-Wakefield)
Second Plymouth and Norfolk D+14 Dem Dem 13 5 16 27 Brady (D-Brockton) Gordon (R-Hanson)
Cape and Islands D+12 Dem Dem 1 13 4 15 26 Cyr (D-Truro) Lauzon (R-Barnstable)
Hampden and Hampshire D+6 Dem Dem 16 −1 10 21 Velis (D-Westfield) Calabrese (R-Agawam)
Norfolk, Plymouth and Bristol D+11 Dem Dem 16 3 14 25 Timilty (D-Milton) Muello (R-Braintree)
Second Essex D+12 Dem Dem 18 4 15 26 Lovely (D-Salem) Anketell (R-Peabody)
Third Essex D+13 Dem Dem 21 4 15 26 Crighton (D-Lynn) Sulustri (I-Swampscott)
Middlesex and Worcester D+20 Dem Dem 21 10 21 32 Eldridge (D-Acton) Christakis (R-Wayland)
First Worcester D+17 Dem 24 1 12 24 Kennedy (D-Worcester) Mair (U-Berlin)
Berkshire, Hampden, Franklin and Hampshire D+18 Dem 1 26 2 13 24 Mark (D-Becket) Phair (U-Pittsfield)
1 Not all results reported